Student: Hi Dr. Pierce. If you don’t think what we have chosen is aiming high for this assignment, will you tell us when we meet to practice in class or will we just do our best for the 5 points when we deliver the monologue next week?
Me: Hi _______. That’s an interesting question, which means it is also complicated to answer. When we meet for class on rehearsal day (the day when you are bringing in a hard copy of your script) we will talk a little bit further about what makes for a compelling theme but for the most part we will focus on delivery generally and delivery of the monologues in particular. If, after that discussion, a student is convinced they need to change their monologue I’m not going to object but I also won’t be telling anyone that their monologue should be changed. Generally speaking, I will recommend to everyone that they stick with the monologue they bring to class when we meet to rehearse because it doesn’t make a lot of sense to do all of that practicing in class and then switch monologues.
Ultimately if you look at the assignment description this is a small assignment (5%) and everyone who delivers any monologue at all gets at least 2/5. The remaining 3/5 is split equally between delivery and content of the monologue. So ultimately I would rather students did a really excellent job of performing a monologue with a less-than-stellar theme than I would students change their monologues and risk poor delivery, start-overs, and general dissatisfaction with their performance.
Q: I just had a question about the monologue speech. I know in class today you said try not to use accents. The monologue I want to do actually is of a girl doing a British accent. Would it be alright if I did the British accent? I think it will definitely help me separate myself from the character an just be the character. I have been practicing the speech in the accent and have also been told that it is a pretty good British accent.
A: It’s not really a “is it alright” question – I just want you to use your judgment. I recommend against accents because a) they’re hard to do, b) it’s an unnecessary complication to what is already a challenging assignment, c) they’re usually (and this is where you might have a different issue) irrelevant to the material being communicated…so why add the labor?, d) even if all of those other things are true, most accents (this isn’t usually true of British accents) just wind up making the speaker appear racist. So if you have objections to those concerns than use your judgment and do what you think is going to get you the best possible performance with the least amount of possible distractions and complications. Sorry I can’t be more “yes” or “no” but exercising judgment amidst uncertainty is roughly 92 percent of what we do all semester – so I want you to practice!
Response from Student:
Ok. Thank you. I will try it without the accent or just practice with both and see which is most comfortable. I am just so used to hearing it in the accent.
Response from Me:
LOL the email was supposed to indicate that I was leaning toward “do the accent” without stealing your agency- if its more work to drop it than to keep it AND it’s British and therefore not likely to come across as racist AND you prefer it to help you get into character AND your accent is pretty good….see where i’m going?
Most public speakers (especially new public speakers) have a bad habit of re-introducing their speech. It usually looks something like this:
“Hi everybody. I wrote this speech on (insert topic) so, yeah….”
“Dang I am SO nervous…”
“My name is (insert name) and well here goes nothing…”
Although it’s a natural inclination I strongly recommend against the pre-introduction, introduction for a couple of reasons.
- It disconnects you from your audience. While telling the audience that you are nervous makes you feel relief, it sets them up to not like the speech; so alleviating your nervousness (which it won’t, by the way) comes at the expense of the audience’s interesting. You’re basically saying, “I’m not ready to do this, don’t bother listening.”
- It undercuts your introduction. You spend time writing an introduction, on paper, trying to think of something captivating. If you want to say your name, then put your name IN the introduction. But if everyone begins with their name, then after the first few speeches it becomes a signal that your speech is just like the speech of everyone else. So write a catchy introduction – if you want to say your name or something then say it – don’t leave it for some kind of “extra” sentence or two.
- It messes with your time. I’ve seen people add 30 seconds to a speech just because they rambled ahead of time. That can be the difference between ending on time and not.
- It gets you off track. You have a speech. You’ve practiced the speech. When you add things in the beginning that you didn’t plan it can often get the rest of the speech off track. I’ve seen people give “extra” intro-intros and then freeze and say, “crap I can’t remember the beginning of the speech.”
- Because great public speakers don’t do it. Martin Luther King didn’t stand up and say, “so yeah I’m MLK and I’m stressed out about this speech.” They went in, and they went in hard. Act as if. Believe in what you’re saying. If you have this urge to tell people the speech isn’t that good then….well….maybe you don’t love it and next time you should try to write something that you’re EXCITED to say.
I love this little blog from Ginger Public Speaking (a public speaking training/coaching firm) that discusses 5 great “opening lines” from various Ted Talks: http://www.gingerpublicspeaking.com/best-speech-opening-line