Q: I just had a question about the monologue speech. I know in class today you said try not to use accents. The monologue I want to do actually is of a girl doing a British accent. Would it be alright if I did the British accent? I think it will definitely help me separate myself from the character an just be the character. I have been practicing the speech in the accent and have also been told that it is a pretty good British accent.
A: It’s not really a “is it alright” question – I just want you to use your judgment. I recommend against accents because a) they’re hard to do, b) it’s an unnecessary complication to what is already a challenging assignment, c) they’re usually (and this is where you might have a different issue) irrelevant to the material being communicated…so why add the labor?, d) even if all of those other things are true, most accents (this isn’t usually true of British accents) just wind up making the speaker appear racist. So if you have objections to those concerns than use your judgment and do what you think is going to get you the best possible performance with the least amount of possible distractions and complications. Sorry I can’t be more “yes” or “no” but exercising judgment amidst uncertainty is roughly 92 percent of what we do all semester – so I want you to practice!
Response from Student:
Ok. Thank you. I will try it without the accent or just practice with both and see which is most comfortable. I am just so used to hearing it in the accent.
Response from Me:
LOL the email was supposed to indicate that I was leaning toward “do the accent” without stealing your agency- if its more work to drop it than to keep it AND it’s British and therefore not likely to come across as racist AND you prefer it to help you get into character AND your accent is pretty good….see where i’m going?
Most public speakers (especially new public speakers) have a bad habit of re-introducing their speech. It usually looks something like this:
“Hi everybody. I wrote this speech on (insert topic) so, yeah….”
“Dang I am SO nervous…”
“My name is (insert name) and well here goes nothing…”
Although it’s a natural inclination I strongly recommend against the pre-introduction, introduction for a couple of reasons.
- It disconnects you from your audience. While telling the audience that you are nervous makes you feel relief, it sets them up to not like the speech; so alleviating your nervousness (which it won’t, by the way) comes at the expense of the audience’s interesting. You’re basically saying, “I’m not ready to do this, don’t bother listening.”
- It undercuts your introduction. You spend time writing an introduction, on paper, trying to think of something captivating. If you want to say your name, then put your name IN the introduction. But if everyone begins with their name, then after the first few speeches it becomes a signal that your speech is just like the speech of everyone else. So write a catchy introduction – if you want to say your name or something then say it – don’t leave it for some kind of “extra” sentence or two.
- It messes with your time. I’ve seen people add 30 seconds to a speech just because they rambled ahead of time. That can be the difference between ending on time and not.
- It gets you off track. You have a speech. You’ve practiced the speech. When you add things in the beginning that you didn’t plan it can often get the rest of the speech off track. I’ve seen people give “extra” intro-intros and then freeze and say, “crap I can’t remember the beginning of the speech.”
- Because great public speakers don’t do it. Martin Luther King didn’t stand up and say, “so yeah I’m MLK and I’m stressed out about this speech.” They went in, and they went in hard. Act as if. Believe in what you’re saying. If you have this urge to tell people the speech isn’t that good then….well….maybe you don’t love it and next time you should try to write something that you’re EXCITED to say.
I love this little blog from Ginger Public Speaking (a public speaking training/coaching firm) that discusses 5 great “opening lines” from various Ted Talks: http://www.gingerpublicspeaking.com/best-speech-opening-line
Q: I’m working on finding a monologue for our assignment and I think I’ve found a good one. I found a script of it on one of the websites you put in the folder. However, after watching the scene, the script was much shorter than the actual scene. I can fit all of the script into two minutes but can’t pause as much as he does in the actual scene. Is it allowed to cut out parts of the monologue that are unnecessary for understanding the theme?
Hello anonymous student,
I don’t recommend using a script from the internet. I recommend watching the scene and writing the script yourself, especially if you can start out writing it by hand so you remember it better.
Once you’ve done that, if the scene is still too long you can either start it later or end it earlier, trying not to cut out anything important for the central idea. In some instances I’m okay if you take out a chunk from the center but that’s it, only remove one big chunk. Don’t cut and paste. It will make it harder to memorize because it will lose the flow of the script.
With respect to delivery, I don’t recommend significantly altering the delivery of the scene especially if it’s to make the time. However, some slowing down or speeding up isn’t a huge deal. I find that most monologues are actually too fast for me. But in some instances they’re way too slow. Mostly, however, I try to stay within 10 or 20 wpm of the original.
I hope that helps.
You all should REALLY read this….
Most students, when faced with a similar interview situation, fall back on emphasizing their activities and the traits they signal. “Running my church youth group,” they might say, “is another example of my leadership ability.”Olivia followed a different path. She didn’t emphasize her activities (which, in isolation, weren’t all that impressive) or the qualities they supposedly signaled, instead she let her natural interestingness come through – and her interviewers were entranced. Put another way: she rejected the list quality hypothesis, embraced the interestingness hypothesis, and won a full-ride scholarship for her efforts.
Source: Want to Get into Harvard? Spend More Time Staring at the Clouds: Rethinking the Role of Extracurricular Activities in College Admissions – Study Hacks – Cal Newport
First day of class! Not much to report. We began discussing the upcoming Monologue Speech assignment and the importance of “interestingness” and a strong central idea, which was illustrated using the Cerulean Monologue from the Devil Wears Prada. More information can be found at the course eLC page–>content–>assignment description and samples–>monologue.
Welcome everyone. I hope you have a great semester and please contact me if you have any questions.
This blog is just a place for me to post follow up materials each week as the course progresses – materials that are useful but not required and would clutter up the eLC page. I recommend people follow my WordPress but I don’t require it. Anything that is crucial for everyone I will send by email and/or post to eLC. Everything that is just useful I will put here.
Like all human beings I change my foci hundreds of times a day so the blog is a way to write about something that might be useful or relevant to me (and you) today but that won’t still be on my mind come Thursday.
Do with it what you will.